Sunday, December 29, 2013

Aham 'I' and AhamkAra 'I-ness', 'I am Doer', 'Ego'


The word Aham 'I' is often confused. When we say, Aham, it is just 'I' and not Ego. AhamkAra can be split into two words 'aham' and 'kara', aham means 'I' and kara means 'doer'. Hence the word ahamkAra verily means, 'I am doer'. This difference is not understood by most non-advaitins and hence they wrongly understand the Advaitic interpretation of mahAvAkya-s.

When I say, I am Brahman (aham BrahmAsmi - aham brahma-asmi), then some wrongly take it 'I' as Ego or 'I' as Jiva. For there there is an a priori (presumption) that I ma Jiva. Hence they understand that I, the Jiva, becomes Brahman. While Advaita says, I m not Jiva. Hence ask 'Who am I', the answer is 'I' am Brahman. 

So, 

The word 'am' seems to create confusion. It makes us think that the word 'am' indicates 'to become' i.e. it denotes transformation. This would resemble to pariNAma vAda, in which milk turns into curd. While Advaita does not think in the same way. Advaita adopts vivarta vAda. Hence there is no transformation. Only wrong notion is removed.

I ≠ Jiva 
I = Brahman

Advaita begins with dvaita and assumes or say presumes that 'I' is wrongly taken for granted as 'body' or 'Jiva'. Hence Advaita asks us to find this 'I'. Lets substitute 'am' in the above mahAvAkya with 'is'. The mahAvAkya becomes

'I' is Brahman

'I am Brahman' may seem to look like upadeshaka vAkya, but in reality it is a state of Self Realization. Put in other words, One realizes that 'I am Brahman'. For sake of understanding, to explain non-advaitins, we can say 'I is Brahman' as this will remove a priori and the wrong understanding of transformation.

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Happy New Year 2014

Happy New Year 2014

On this occasion of New Year, I express my deepest love and wishing you a year of real peace, bliss, and love to continue for the rest of your life.


Growth means success


Growth is a parameter of development. We need to become greater, to gain in strength, if we are to adequately face the challenges of life and find both balance and ultimate success. No doubt that the external journey is necessary as we progress through life but the inner journey is the essential factor for our evolution.


Opportunities - Use for internal and external Growth


God creates opportunities, and we must proceed with the best effort. The plants, trees, and creepers are moving towards light. Let us move towards the life goal of realizing the reality and divinity, which is already within us.


A Self Promise


Let us make a promise, not to repeat the mistakes done in past. Not repeating a mistake is a virtue. Let the virtues in life replace our vices.


Life – A gift of God


Life is a beautiful gift of God. Let us consciously use His gifts in loving and serving His creation. Let our life become a life of love and service. We can really love when there is no desire to be loved. We can really serve when the desire to be served does not exist within.


A New Life – A Better Life


Let us begin a new life, a life of love and compassion, a life of purity and simplicity, a life of dedication and service, a life of prayer and meditation.


A Gift to God


Every moment we are to be a better person as in every moment we are one moment closer to God. What we are is the gift of God to us. What we become will be our gift to God.

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Thinking that only my religion is true and all others are false is not right



Sincere Devotion is the Key

Sri Ramakrishna (to the goswami): When one develops sincere devotion to Him, one can realize the Lord by any religion. The Vaishnavas will attain Him, so will the devotees, the Vedantists and also the Brahmajnanis. And the Muslims and the Christians shall also attain Him. Everybody will attain God if they develop sincere devotion to Him. But some people pick a quarrel. They say, ‘Unless you repeat the name of Lord Krishna, you will not succeed.’ Others say, ‘If you don’t repeat the name of Mother Kali, you will achieve nothing.’ Yet others say, ‘Except through Christianity, you will reach nowhere.’

“Such intelligence is known as ‘dogmatic intellect’. Thinking that only my religion is true and all others are false is not right. You can attain the Lord by many paths.

“Besides, some say that the Lord has a form, that He is not formless, and they quarrel with the others. The Vaishnavas quarrel with the Vedantists. Unless you see the Lord face to face, you cannot talk of Him correctly. He who has seen Him, knows that the Lord has forms and He is also formless. What else He is cannot be talked about.

An Example of Elephant and Blind Men

“A number of blind men came to an elephant. Somebody told them that it was an elephant. The blind men asked, ‘What is the elephant like?’ and they began to touch its body. One of them said, ‘It is like a pillar.’ This blind man had only touched its leg. Another man said, ‘The elephant is like a husking basket.’ This person had only touched its ears. Similarly, he who touched its trunk or its belly talked of it differently. In the same way, he who has seen the Lord in a particular way limits the Lord to that alone and thinks that He is nothing else.

An Example of Chameleon

“A person, having defecated in a jungle, said when he returned, ‘I have seen a beautiful red chameleon under a tree.’ Another person said, ‘I went before you under that tree. Why, it is not red, it is green. I saw it with my own eyes.’ And another person said, ‘I know it well. I went earlier than both of you. I have also seen that chameleon. It is blue.’ Two other people reported that it was yellow or brown, as well as of various colours. This led to a big quarrel. Everybody thought that what he had seen is true. Finding them quarreling, a person said, ‘What is the matter, brothers?’ When he heard their accounts, he said, ‘I live under this very tree. I know very well what this animal is like. Each one of you is right in describing it. It is a chameleon – sometimes green, at other times blue, then again other colours. And at times I find it has no colour at all – it is attributeless.’ ”

Source: Ramakrishna Kathamrita, Vol II, Section II, Chapter V

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Different Paths for Different Individuals Says Suta Samhita of Skanda Purana

The systems of philosophy to which the Indian mind has given birth   range   from   the   ultra-materialistic   system   of   a Charvaka to the most sublime ultraspiritual system of the Vedanta. It must, however, be borne in mind that all these apparently most divergent systems of thought are necessary steps through which the intellect of man must pass and has passed, marking as they do the various stages of man's intellectual  development. The  various  systems  have  bee intended as the training ground for the varying intellects of man, one system leading to another, each man honestly taking to that system of thought which appeals to him most, as best suited to the grain of his mind, as the system which to him appears to embody rules of conduct based on a most rational basis. When the different systems are viewed in this light, when the value of even the most materialistic philosophy of a Charvaka is recognised as perforce gradually in the course of enquiry leading the intellect to a less materialistic and more spiritual system, the intellect finding no rest till it lands upon the most convicting truth, it becomes easy to understand what the author of the Purana means when he speaks of the different systems of faith in the following terms:

"Listen with faith, O sages, to what I say as to the truth of the various paths. Vedas, Dharmasastras, Purana, Bharata, Vedangas and minor Vedas; Kamika and other agamas; Kapala and Lakula in all their variety; the Pasupata, Soma, Bhairava and other agamas with their hundred varieties: Vaishnava and Brahma agamas; the agamas of the Buddhas and the Arhats; Lokayata, and the Tarkasastras in all their vastness; the profound Mimamsa, as also Sankhya and Yoga; all these and many more Sastras, the Omniscient Divine Being has made in brief. It is only by the Grace of Rudra that Devas like Brahma and Vishnu, Siddhas, Vidyadharas, Yakshas, Rakshasas, Munis and men make the Sastras again, in brief or in extenso. The wise say that each of these sastras is intended for a particular class according to the individual qualification, not all for one. These paths are not to be rudely handled by the learned subjecting them to rigorous unrelenting logic. As all streams ultimately empty themselves into the ocean, so all these paths ultimately lead to the Mahesvara Himself. Worshipped in what form soever by people as ordained in their respective scriptures. He assumes that form and takes the devotee on to the next higher step, By His Grace man attains to superior paths. The Divine Being worshipped in the form in which He is represented in these paths takes the devotee step by step onward to the path of the Veda. The form which the Divine Being assumes  in  the  path  of  the  Veda  is  the  immediate  cause  of salvation. Even there the form of the Divine Being as represented by the ritualistic portion of the Veda only stimulates a longing for knowledge; while, worshipped in the form presented in the theosophical portion  He  leads  the  devotee  to  moksha  through wisdom.

"As the highest salvation is only of one kind, the knowledge which leads to it must be of one kind and of one kind' only. The Vedanta treats of Sankara as the non-dual Atman. No other path treats of Him directly as the Vedanta does. Therefore knowledge produced by the Veda is alone wisdom. Knowledge obtained by other means is avidya, unwisdom. The other paths cannot themselves lead to moksha; they are serviceable only as leading to it through the intervening steps. Mahadeva, as known by the Vedanta, directly gives moksha; as known and worshipped in the other paths He leads to moksha by gradually taking the soul on to the direct path. Wherefore he  who  treads  the  path  of  the  Vedanta  should  not change it for any other. To those who tread the path of the Veda, nothing is hard to attain. There alone lie the supreme mukti and other enjoyments in plenty.

"Wherefore   the   different   paths   are   useful   to   the   different individuals for whom they are specially intended. Whenever other paths are opposed to the Vedanta in their theories as to the nature of  Isvara, as  to the cause of bondage, as  to  the cause of  the Universe, as to mukti, and as to what constitutes wisdom, and so on, those theories, to be sure, have been furnished in accordance with the prevailing desires of the ignorant whose minds are darkened by the mighty delusion: not because they are absolutely true in themselves, but because they serve, by holding out some legitimate pleasures to ultimately bring them round to the right path when their sins have been washed away in the waters of the more or less pure morality therein inculcated. As man allures an erratic cow by holding out grass, so does Mahesvara first hold out some  pleasure  and  then  gives  supreme  wisdom  as  the  mind becomes perfected.

"Thus these paths, laid out as they are by Siva, are all of them true and serviceable. How can Siva be a deceiver? He is supremely merciful, omniscient, and altogether stainless. Yet of all the paths, the  path  of  the  Veda  is  the  best.  as  conducing  to  all  good." 

(Skanda-Purana, Suta-Samhita, Yajna-Vaibhava-Khanda, 22nd adhyaya).

This unique attitude of the Purana towards the several antagonistic systems of religion and philosophy only gives expression to the consciousness of the fact that mankind, made up as it is of different individuals who have reached different stages of intellectual and moral progress, cannot all think to order, in one and the same way

Source: Dakshinamurti Stotra With Manasollasa Of Sureshwaracharya Translated by Alladi Mahadeva Sastri. Pages 35-37




 
^

Powered by BloggerINDIASPIRITUALITY Lite by UsuárioCompulsivo
original Washed Denim by Darren Delaye
Creative Commons License